
Role of Resolution on Atmospheric Dynamics during Fani Cyclone in the Indian Subcontinent
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/jasr.v9i3.13484Abstract
A persistent discrepancy between mathematically modeled atmospheric circulation and observed precipitation has become increasingly evident over recent decades. High-resolution numerical weather prediction (NWP) models offer a pathway to reduce this gap, yet their practical deployment is constrained by limited data availability, high computational cost, and reliance on traditional model verification measures. This study proposes an efficient NWP framework implemented on small-scale parallel computing systems using an adaptive grid-resolution strategy within the well-known Nonhydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM), enabling global weather analysis. By systematically varying horizontal grid spacing, the approach identifies the minimum resolution required to reliably capture mesoscale variations in wind, temperature, and precipitation while maintaining computational efficiency for targeted forecasting objectives. Global cloud-resolving simulations using NICAM are conducted under low-pressure conditions characteristic of cyclone formation over the Indian subcontinent, with specific focus on Cyclone Fani. Results show that even at reduced resolution, the model reproduces key atmospheric dynamics, including temperature, pressure, wind velocity, and precipitation at both near-surface and upper-atmospheric levels. These findings indicate that reasonable coarse-resolution NICAM simulations executed on small-scale parallel computing systems can effectively capture the essential atmospheric circulation associated with Cyclone Fani, providing a computationally efficient alternative for high-resolution numerical weather prediction.
Keywords:
Climate Model; Atmospheric Dynamics; Nonhydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM)References
[1] Charney, J.G., Fjörtoft, R., Neumann, J.V., 1950. Numerical integration of the barotropic vorticity equation. Tellus. 2(4), 237–254.
[2] McGuffie, K., Henderson-Sellers, A., 2001. Forty years of numerical climate modelling. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 21(9), 1067–1109.
[3] Lynch, P., 2008. The origins of computer weather prediction and climate modeling. Journal of Computational Physics.227(7), 3431–3444.
[4] Dymnikov, V.P., Filatov, A.N., 2012. Mathematics of Climate Modeling. Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland.
[5] Phillips, N.A., 1956. The general circulation of the atmosphere: A numerical experiment. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 82(352), 123–164.
[6] Staniforth, A., Wood, N., 2008. Aspects of the dynamical core of a nonhydrostatic, deep-atmosphere, unified weather and climate-prediction model. Journal of Computational Physics. 227(7), 3445–3464.
[7] Fosser, G., Gaetani, M., Kendon, E.J., et al., 2024. Convection-permitting climate models offer more certain extreme rainfall projections. NPJ Climate and Atmospheric Science. 7(1), 51.
[8] Roberts, M.J., Vidale, P.L., Senior, C., et al., 2018. The Benefits of Global High Resolution for Climate Simulation:Process Understanding and the Enabling of Stakeholder Decisions at the Regional Scale. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 99(11), 2341–2359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00320.1
[9] Iseh, A.J., Woma, T.Y., 2013. Weather forecasting models, methods and applications. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology. 2(12), 1945–1956.
[10] Gupta, P., Verma, S., Mukhopadhyay, P., et al., 2024. Fidelity of WRF model in simulating heat wave events over India. Scientific Reports. 14(1), 2693.
[11] da Rocha Bartolomei, F., Simões Reboita, M., Chrysostomo de Oliveira Nogueira, N., et al., 2024. Atmospheric Circulation in the Furnas Reservoir Region, MG: Sensitivity Experiments with RegCM5 in Convection-Permitting Mode. Journal of Atmospheric Science Research. 7(3), 111–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jasr.v7i3.6633
[12] Feng, Z., Prein, A.F., Kukulies, J., et al., 2025. Mesoscale convective systems tracking method intercomparison(MCSMIP): Application to DYAMOND global km-scale simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 130(8), e2024JD042204.
[13] Xue, M., Droegemeier, K.K., Weber, D., 2007. Numerical prediction of high-impact local weather: A driver for petascale computing. In Petascale Computing: Algorithms and Applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA.
[14] Wedi, N.P., 2014. Increasing horizontal resolution in numerical weather prediction and climate simulations: illusion or panacea? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 372(2018), 20130289.
[15] Govett, M., Bah, B., Bauer, P., et al., 2024. Exascale computing and data handling: Challenges and opportunities for weather and climate prediction. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 105(12), E2385–E2404.
[16] Ramu, D.A., Dhakate, A.R., Pillai, P.A., et al., 2023. Assessment of extreme seasonal rainfall over India in current seasonal coupled models during the recent period. Climate Dynamics. 61(1), 461–487.
[17] Krishna, R.P.M., Kumar, S., Prajeesh, A.G., et al., 2024. IITM High-Resolution Global Forecast Model Version 1: An attempt to resolve monsoon prediction deadlock. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions. 2024, 1–26.
[18] Sagar, A.K., Chakraborty, A., 2024. Spatial changes of driving parameters affecting cyclonic activity over the North Indian Ocean from 1960 to 2020. Journal of Atmospheric Science Research. 7(4), 13–22.
[19] Evgeny, L., Vasiliy, P., 2024. Convective Phenomenes in the Context of Meso-β-scale Convective Structures. Journal of Atmospheric Science Research. 7(3), 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jasr.v7i3.6278
[20] Bhowmik, M., Hazra, A., Srivastava, A., et al., 2024. Improved Indian Summer Monsoon rainfall simulation: the significance of reassessing the autoconversion parameterization in coupled climate model. Climate Dynamics. 62(6), 5543.
[21] Goto, D., Sato, Y., Yashiro, H., et al., 2020. Global aerosol simulations using NICAM. 16 on a 14 km grid spacing for a climate study: Improved and remaining issues relative to a lower-resolution model. Geoscientific Model Development. 13(8), 3731–3768.
[22] Takasuka, D., Kodama, C., Suematsu, T., et al., 2024. How Can We Improve the Seamless Representation of Climatological Statistics and Weather Toward Reliable Global K-Scale Climate Simulations? Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. 16(2), e2023MS003701.
[23] Wu, X., Fu, Q., Kodama, C., 2023. Response of tropical overshooting deep convection to global warming based on global cloud-resolving model simulations. Geophysical Research Letters. 50(14), e2023GL104210.
[24] Satoh, M., 2002. Conservative scheme for the compressible nonhydrostatic models with the horizontally explicit and vertically implicit time integration scheme. Monthly Weather Review. 130(5), 1227–1245.
[25] Stuhne, G.R., Peltier, W.R., 1999. New icosahedral grid-point discretizations of the shallow water equations on the sphere. Journal of Computational Physics. 148(1), 23–58.
[26] Miura, H., 2007. An upwind-biased conservative advection scheme for spherical hexagonal–pentagonal grids. Monthly Weather Review. 135(12), 4038–4044.
[27] Satoh, M., Matsuno, T., Tomita, H., et al., 2008. Nonhydrostatic icosahedral atmospheric model (NICAM) for global cloud resolving simulations. Journal of Computational Physics. 227(7), 3486–3514.
[28] Yokoi, S., Kajikawa, Y., 2024. Precipitation diurnal cycle over tropical coastal regions represented in climate experiments with a global cloud-system resolving model. SOLA. 20, 145–151.
[29] Li, Y., Qian, C., Fan, X., et al., 2023. Impact of tropical cyclones over the North Indian Ocean on weather in China and related forecasting techniques: A review of progress. Journal of Meteorological Research. 37(2), 192–207.
[30] Takasuka, D., Becker, T., Bao, J., 2026. Precipitation characteristics and thermodynamic-convection coupling in global kilometer-scale simulations. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. 18(3), e2025MS005343.
[31] Randall, D.A., Ringler, T.D., Heikes, R.P., et al., 2002. Climate modeling with spherical geodesic grids. Computing in Science & Engineering. 4(5), 32–41.
[32] National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce, 2000. NCEP FNL Operational Model Global Tropospheric Analyses, Continuing from July 1999. NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research: Boulder, CO, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5065/D6M043C6
[33] Oakforest-PACS, 2020. Oakforest-PACS Supercomputer System. Joint Center for Advanced High Performance Computing (JCAHPC): Kashiwa, Japan. Available from: https://www.jcahpc.jp/eng/supercomputer/ofp-e.html
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2026 B. V. Rathish Kumar, Vinay Kumar, Chitranjan Pandey, Sourabh P. Bhat, Shainath Kalamkar, Bipin Kumar

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.







B. V. Rathish Kumar